Wednesday, September 19, 2012

RomneyCare Vs. ObamaCare - The Big Differences




RomneyCare
ObamaCare
Overall Size and Scope
1) Whole bill was 70 pages
2) Romney vetoed significant sections of the bill including the employer penalty for not providing health insurance
3) Romney favored an “opt out” provision from the mandate
4) Romney wanted no mandated benefits for health care coverage, 'catastrophic' coverage only
5) No federal gov. insurance option
6) Intended as a market driven solution to healthcare
1) Whole bill was 2,074 pages
2) Very broad regulation of the insurance industry including an employer penalty for not providing health insurance 
3) No “opt out” provision
4) Many mandated benefits. Establishes a 15 member board of unelected bureaucrats with great control over health care benefits and risks rationing health care
5) Leaves open the option of creating single-payer gov. insurance in the future
6) Intended as a step toward gov. run insurance
Costs
1) No new taxes!
2) Romney balanced the state’s budget first, then passed healthcare law
3) No cuts to Medicare benefits
4) Modest cost to state (only added 1% to state budget)
1) Increased taxes by $500 billion
-Taxes people who don’t buy insurance
2) Despite massive federal gov. debt, Obama still passed Obamacare
3) Cuts Medicare by $719 billion
4) Overall costs unknown!
Popularity
1) Very strong bipartisan support
2) Strong special interest support
3) Very popular among the public in Massachusetts
4) Strong consensus of approval was built in the state to support the law
-Consensus was built to support an individual mandate
1) Absolutely no bipartisan support
2) Very controversial and divided special interest groups
3) Unpopular in nation overall
4) No consensus was built to support a mandate
Does the Constitution Define it as a “Tax” or “Penalty/Fee”?
1) Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts ruled state mandates are “penalties” because states have different authority and powers than the fed. gov.
-Massachusetts constitution never considered this a tax
1) Supreme Court ruled that federal gov. only has the authority to enact this law by its ability to “tax,” and does not meet the required standards to be considered a “penalty.”
-This tax will be enforced by the IRS
-Breaks Obama’s promise that he would not raise taxes on the middle class
Federalism
1) A unique solution created by a state to solve its particular problems
-Through collaboration and discussion, Massachusetts created a consensus among stakeholders to support the new law

2) Much easier to change and adapt a state law if problems arise. If MA doesn’t like the law, they can change it. 
-ObamaCare, however, is a new federal/nationwide entitlement program (like Medicare & Social Security), thus extremely difficult to reform.
1) Federal gov. “one-size-fits-all” plan
-Doesn’t take into account that each state is unique in important ways such as:
A)Vastly different debt levels between states (some states can’t afford new spending on health care)
B)Some states have twice the percentage of uninsured citizens (Much greater costs will be imposed on states with a larger percentage of uninusured citizens)
C)Conservative states and citizens will reject implementation of federal gov. plan, including the individual mandate
Different Outcomes from Each Plan


1) 98.1% of adults and 99.8% of children have health insurance
2) The number of employers offering health insurance went up from 70% to 76%
3) Did not make doctor shortages worse
4) Overall, premium prices have gone down for most groups
5) No negative affect on job creation in the state
6) Created to help the poor afford health insurance 
1) According to the CBO, 30 million people will still not have health insurance after fully implemented. Only covers an additional 6.3% of Americans. 10% of America will still be uninsured
2) The CBO estimates that fewer people will get health insurance from their employer 
3) NY Times says it will make doctors shortages worse in some areas of the country
4) Since passage, premium prices have risen 9% per year
5) CBO estimates there will be less jobs as a result
6) Some states will have almost everyone in the state getting some form of subsidy to buy health insurance

9 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My wife has a small business with 7 employees, who are professional social services workers providing private services to individuals with disabilities. Our group’s average age is about 47; her company offers a High Deductible group medical plan at a cost to the company of over $5,000 per month. If she hired younger workers without health related problems we might be able to find coverage for ½ that price or not offer health coverage at all. As the company is up front is passing on any profits made to all the employees, the younger workers are resentful for having to pay more insurance for the older workers and just want to opt out of the insurance and have the company tell each to get individual plans. It is interesting that our micro group is mimicking the macro national debate on Health Care. As individual employees and has citizens it seems that some sort of mandate is needed to require everyone to contribute to the Health Care cost. If Mitt Romney would commit to not appealing Obama Care until some sort of compromise is reached that will allow every American affordable health care, I am certain that many independent voters would be more likely to support him for President. We as a society spend large amount of resources in public funds and resources supporting Health Care, though education, construction, tax breaks, health care facilities even benefit from the improved transportation systems to get individuals to the Health Care business. (Health Care services are not private ventures!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, Nice post thanks for sharing. Would you please consider adding a link to my website on your page. Please email me back. Thanks!

    Aaron Grey
    aarongrey112@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. It was so wonderful as well as valuable, it definitely gives a lot of information. It may assist a lot more to a particular individual who review out this web page efficiently and Look at this effectively and definitely need to know what you have analyzed to know its utilization. Buy herbal incense to keep us healthy and these herbal plants are very useful and helpful to protect us and stay healthy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I found very informative blog when I was reading this. I was searching this kind of information since a long time. Thank you for sharing it.
    Herbal Potpourri

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice blog. It inspires me a lot. Thanks for publishing such useful information.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow, absolutely fantastic blog. I am very glad to have such useful information. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nice blog. It inspires me a lot. Thanks for publishing such useful information. for more details you can go to below link…
    extreme incense

    ReplyDelete